Diablo III

Diablo Community Manager On Possible Battle.net Charges!

DiabloFans.com picked up this information from their esteemed Diablo Dev Tracker! It looks like Bashiok was recently on the Battle.net forums talking about some of the paid-for options that might make it into Battle.net and the next release of Diablo.  One example offered up is that players could pay to have a fallen hardcore character resurrected. We'll keep you updated as soon as any decision is made either way!

Here's the original post from Diablofans.com:

A member on the Battle.net forums recently inquired about whether or not people would have to pay fees in order to play Diablo 3 online. Bashiok responded with the following information:

Quote:
"Mike mentioned it in an Activision Blizzard investor meeting [paraphrased] "A player that buys Starcraft 2 at retail will have the ability to play on Battle.net with no additional fee."

I'll point out that this is a very carefully worded statement."

Bashiok then went on to discuss how some pay-for ideas could possibly work for the game.

Quote:
"One pay-for idea that specifically relates to Diablo that I thought was kind of interesting was the chance to resurrect a fallen hardcore character.

I think this was mentioned by a fan, as far as I know we're not even thinking about these types of pay-for options yet. But, I think it's kind of interesting. I'm not sure if I like the idea or not, which is probably why I like thinking about it. There are some obvious pros and some obvious cons, but I'm not sure there's a clear cut answer as to whether it would work well or not."

Obviously, none of us would like to have to pay additional fees in order to use Battle.net. If nothing else, I believe anybody who buys the inevitably pricier "Collector's Edition" of Diablo 3 when it comes out should never have to pay Battle.net fees to play the game.

However, this does raise the question: What special features would you pay Battle.net fees for with Diablo 3 other than the chance to resurrect a fallen hardcore character? Is there anything that you feel would be worth spending a little extra cash on to make the online gameplay more interesting?

  • Comments

Add Comment  

Add

You need to login or register to post.

Benefits of Registration

  • Interact with hundreds of thousands of other gamers on an open social network.
  • Post your stories, news, images, videos, and other content to share.
  • Create a network with your fellow gamers or join an existing one.
  • Gain reputation for everything you do.
 
  • Sun, Jul 5 2009 6:03 PM ()

    Eh i dont mind. Honestly, why do people care so much?

    You would honestly rather have a hardcore character, level 99, die and be permanently erased than have a CHOICE to pay X dollars to bring him back? (As softcore)

    seriously, some poeple simply cannot be pleased. To them more options is a bad thing.

    However a monthly fee is not a good thing. Monthly fee = i will not be on B.net.

  • Sun, Jul 5 2009 6:38 AM ()

    I agree with kkotd. Blizzard seems to have changed their focus lately. What has changed? And why did it become all about money after they got all the money they could want?

  • Fri, Jul 3 2009 9:05 PM ()

    Im not really sure id be happy myself if we started seeing fees for battlenet.. for anything. I like blizzard games and i want to play SC2 and D3 but they can be enjoyed without any battle.net services too. (not to the same extent perhaps but enjoyed none-the-less)

  • kkotd said 
    Fri, Jul 3 2009 5:37 PM ()

    None, nada, zero! I'm one of the people that out there that doesn't have to buy their product... I'm not a crazed fanboy of Blizzard anymore and, if anything, I'm really critical on everything they've done for the last two years. If there are any fees for Battlenet, that are not cosmetic and are potentionally game changing then I won't buy it! There are other ways to find entertainment other than their ass-backwards design of putting in Micro-transactions into every little feature they decide to implement...

  • 1 page(s)
  • Syndication