<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://my.curse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Warth of the Lich King Review Part 1</title><link>http://my.curse.com/blogs/the-daily-quest-en-users/archive/2008/12/12/warth-of-the-lich-king-review-part-1.aspx</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve been reading through review after review after review that piles praise and medals on Blizzard Entertainment for their latest expansion to World of Warcraft - Warth of the Lich King. Sadly, I think that the age of the neutral review is well and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title /><link>http://my.curse.com/blogs/the-daily-quest-en-users/archive/2008/12/12/warth-of-the-lich-king-review-part-1.aspx#368799</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:27:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">045f8e2a-3b25-43b2-9769-9c60de2974e3:368799</guid><dc:creator>DWSR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. I think your review&amp;#39;s fairly neutral.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://my.curse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=368799" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title /><link>http://my.curse.com/blogs/the-daily-quest-en-users/archive/2008/12/12/warth-of-the-lich-king-review-part-1.aspx#368627</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:31:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">045f8e2a-3b25-43b2-9769-9c60de2974e3:368627</guid><dc:creator>hakmajik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For your next installment: spellcheck.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://my.curse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=368627" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>