Loading...

simple universal UI (slightly modified)

Rate It!
Click image to display in actual size

I've modified my UI (here: http://my.curse.com/media/p/477475.aspx) a little.

Mainly I changed the all game fonts to SCT Emblem. Also the inventory scale got reduced and the tradeskill action bar hidden (0% opacity to the left of the runic healing potion). The Aura bar is one row again, Critline and Combatstats were uninstalled.

The addon comparing stats on items is called Ratingbuster.

Posted: Mon, Jun 1 2009
Game: World of Warcraft
Category: User Interface
Views: 1,827
Comments: 13
Full Size: 1260 x 788
  • Submitted by
IRID1UM
 
View

simple universal UI (slightly modified)

(World of Warcraft)
See all images (2)
Tags: 
 
  • Comments

Add Comment

Add

You need to login or register to post.

Benefits of Registration

  • Interact with hundreds of thousands of other gamers on an open social network.
  • Post your stories, news, images, videos, and other content to share.
  • Create a network with your fellow gamers or join an existing one.
  • Gain reputation for everything you do.
 
  • Skorr said 
    Fri, Nov 6 2009 9:53 AM ()

    get squidframe

    Report Permalink
  • SnowmanE said 
    Sat, Jun 27 2009 8:29 AM ()

    Yoo IRID1UM,
    what kinda addons/interface are you using to get that interface?

    Report Permalink
  • IRID1UM said 
    Sat, Jun 6 2009 2:25 AM ()

    Thanks for pointing that out.
    I've never been having trouble ever since I've used Skinner (or OSkin back then). I'm not sure if I'm even using Skinner for the tooltip or if you see the TipTac gradient.

    Report Permalink
  • omega251 said 
    Fri, Jun 5 2009 11:29 AM ()

    I played around with skinner for mine, but I didn't realize how much a resource hog the tooltip part was. Especially for me(a raid healer) my mouse is constantly moving across my raid frames, thus changing the tooltip a lot, and that killed my system. Just thought I'd point out that skinner can cause some problems for lower speed systems, especially for healers.

    Report Permalink
  • IRID1UM said 
    Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:05 AM ()

    dkdanzel is not my mate. I don't even know him.
    Jukki, seriously, grow up. You are insulting people here just because you don't agree with me saying that spartan sucks.
    I somewhat get the feeling that you think your way is the only way. You just can't understand that there are independant people actually thinking the same way as I do... Stop being childish and just let it be, you are embarassing yourself.
    Thanks and have a nice day!

    Report Permalink
  • dkdanzel said 
    Wed, Jun 3 2009 1:06 PM ()

    Well thank you for noticing me. But I must say. You are so dumb right now. I can post my own comment, but hey we both have a point, so deal with it, and maybe check the sex of people before you go post about it.

    Report Permalink
  • Jukki said 
    Wed, Jun 3 2009 11:18 AM ()

    And what comes to your little friend DkDanzel here...
    Man.. go post at your own damn arguments...
    if theres something i hate, thats when some1 is having a convo/argument
    And then some of his mates jumping in defending him/making his point
    Thats what women do.. they cant argue good enough so they pull
    quantity over quality

    Report Permalink
  • moglis23 said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 2:25 PM ()

    thx for the answer m8. Great job on your ui

    Report Permalink
  • IRID1UM said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 12:47 PM ()

    @moglis23: I don't use an UF addon because I use DHUD2 and the unitframe is only of a small relevance. There is no point in wasting resources for an UF addon in that case.

    Jukki: as prot paladin heals cost pretty much of my mana and are somewhat inefficient. Therefore I prefer to keep bandages ready. And also every spell or skill I might need in battle. But as you can see, the stacks still are fairly intact and I indeed use them rarely.
    As the title already says, this is my universal UI for all chars. There still is time to optimize screen space once I hit 80 and trained the last few skills.
    Also, as you can see, I use plenty of keybindings. 6 and 7 are bound to left/right scrollwheel tilt, there is also shift 6/7 and ctrl 6/7, mousebutton 4 and 5 are bound to inventory/char screen, shift&ctrl to heals/cleanse. The top action bar is keyed with shift-1 to 4. I could add more, but it hasn't been necessary so far.

    Report Permalink
  • dkdanzel said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 11:19 AM ()

    @ Jukki.

    Well some of us do actually use that ablities, and I cant really see what the prob is?
    You are running Spartan, right? I would use this at any point instead of Spartan, 'cause that UI is so much of a waste of space, and yes he has so many bars, but at least they are arranged so that they dont take up much space.

    Report Permalink
  • Jukki said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 11:05 AM ()

    Well, i dno what you changed and what not, but what comes for the earlier
    I dont play rogue either, i play holy pala with most of the same skills
    And ive played Prot pala, and i didn't need more then like.. 2 bars in total
    For example, imho you dont need bandages much, you got self heals and Divine plea, you dont need purify etc on your skill bars, get an add and hotkey it to your mouse.. but then again, theres some skills that i wouldn't even have since i prefer auto trigger trinkets etc, wich i only need atm as holy anyways.
    And you got much more macros than i do, mainly because i dnt use macros at all really.. and i dnt get the point anyways.. everywhere i look i c every1 with 5-10 macros in theyr bars.. tbh.. what the hell is the point..
    If you played games like Guild wars wich is much more pvp reliant, and has much faster compbat system, you learn not 2 use macros but be fast

    But hey... what works for me, might not work for you
    And vice versa

    Report Permalink
  • moglis23 said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 10:33 AM ()

    why do u prefer blizzard's unite frames?(no offence)

    Report Permalink
  • IRID1UM said 
    Mon, Jun 1 2009 8:51 AM ()

    I reduced the imagesize for easier viewing, the original resolution is 1680x1050

    Report Permalink